Council officers who abuse their positions of authoirty should be prosecuted under the Fraud Act 2006, a pension would then be proceeds of crime and not payable.





Christine Nuttall, solcitor, Wealden District Council corruption and monument protection English Heritage


Christine Nuttall



Christine Nuttall was one of the solicitors working for the Wealden District Council at the time of the demolition of the Bushy Wood animal sanctuary buildings and the fraudulent presentations to Committee members that resulted in enforcement against the Old Steam House monument. She no longer works for Wealden District Council.


Other officers of this council were also party to the deception over a prolonged period of time, designed to deprive the occupier of the buildings a beneficial use in 1986, with the unlawful suggestion that that buildings would be better in the ownership of neighbors in Lime Park.


Many of you will know that such discrimination is unlawful, according to the European Convention of Human Rights, and of course our own Human Rights Act 1998 under Article 8. Sadly, Wealden District Council ignored European law, and only modified their behaviour to try to get away from past misdeeds in 2000, when the HRA 98 was enacted in the UK.


In 2014 this council refused to correct their records, then a subject of a Data Subject complaint to the Information Commissioner, Christopher Graham. But the Local Land Charges Act 1972 applied back in 2001 as much as it applied today.


We will bring you more on this unresolved saga in the coming months........


ATT: Christine Nuttall FAX TO: 01892 602222
Solicitor & Legal Services Manager
Wealden District Council
Pine Grove
TN6 1DH                                                                                                                 14 August 2001

Dear Mrs Nuttall




I am surprised to learn that you intend seeking yet another Opinion where it seems the Council have obtained no less than 3 Opinions since October 2000 and there have been a number of officer meetings on the subject at a cost to the ratepayer of £4,847.45.

Please advise what further action you intend to take and as requested the timetable for such action. 

If as you say you believe I owe the Council sums, then I hope you will agree it is not reasonable for the Council to delay pursuing the matter. 

For my part I do not accept that I owe the Council the sums it claims, which may be dealt with by way of counterclaim as you are aware and on Notice.

If I do not hear from you within the next 14 days, I intend to rely on this letter for the purpose of the Courts.

Yours sincerely

Nelson J Kruschandl


C.C. Cllrs: Ainslie, Coltman
Hubbard, Thornely-Taylor




Patrick Scarpa, solicitor Wealden District Council David Whibley, enforcement officer Wealden District Council  


Victorio Scarpa, David Whibley, Julian Black, Daniel Goodwin, Christine Arnold


Christine Nuttall, solcitor, Wealden District Council corruption and monument protection English Heritage David Phillips, perjury and corruption Wealden District Council, the Energy Age, Nelson Kruschandl Douglas Moss 


Christine Nuttall, David Phillips, Douglas Moss, Ian Kay, Charles Lant


Abbott Trevor - Alcock Charmain - Ditto - Arnold Chris (Christine) - Barakchizadeh Lesley - Black Julian -Boakes Beverley

Paul Barker - Brigginshaw Marina - Brown Ashley - Coffey Patrick - Douglas Sheelagh - Flemming Mike - Goodwin Daniel

Holness Derek - Hoy Thomas - Johnson Geoff - Kay Ian - Kay I. M. - Lant Charles - Mercer Richard - Mileman Niall

Moon Craig - Moss Douglas, J.Nuttall Christine - Phillips David - Scarpa Victorio - Scott Trevor - Kevin Stewart

Wakeford M. - Whibley David - White, George - Williams Kelvin




Lewes Crown Court, Conviction Quashed - Nelson Kruschandl proves Wealden were lying yet again.   Herstmonceux, Lime Park





These two pictures were saved from Google Maps. They are in the same orientation as the site plan above, north is at the top, south at the bottom and so on.  We are using the corner of The Old Rectory as the reference point - or baseline. The left picture is untouched. The right picture has the position of buildings on the appeal site plan shown in red. You can plainly see that the block Wealden refer to as a "Garden Tool Store" is a bare patch of grass covered land. It is also plain that there are other buildings on this site that are not covered by the enforcement site plan, so immune from enforcement. In 1988 the Judge looking at this information (obviously no Google Maps at the time) found in favour of Mr Nelson Kruschandl, in that a substantial building to the north-east that was used for accommodation is not covered by any enforcement notice. Since that time another substantial building has been added to the west for accommodation, that is also immune from enforcement. This fact is also plain from these pictures.




Section 4    -    Fraud by abuse of position  [such as a planning or police officer]


(1) A person is in breach of this section if he —

(a) occupies a position in which he is expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests of another person,

(b) dishonestly abuses that position, and

(c) intends, by means of the abuse of that position—

(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or

(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

(2)A person may be regarded as having abused his position even though his conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act.



UK Prime Minister Tony Blair laughs as California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger looks on.



Vicarage Lane, Hailsham, East Sussex, BN27 2AX T: 01323 443322
Pine Grove, Crowborough, East Sussex, TN6 1DH T: 01892 653311










This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.



This site is protected under Article10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.