GILES YORK

HOME  |   CASE STUDIES   |   HISTORY  |   LAW   |   MPs  |  POLITICS    |    RIGHTS   |   SITE INDEX

ANY MASONS ON YOUR BEAT? - What of Sussex Police. They have been asked if a member of the public can view their Register of Interests, with an especial leaning toward Masons. The real question is: "Do they have such a register?" If they do, will it be accurate - and if so will it reveal the links between complainants where we know that others masons who are civilians have instigated or at least pushed for the prosecution of another civilian that they have fallen out with.

According to the independent research into police Masonry, Martin Short, author of the most detailed account of modern British freemasonry, 'Inside The Brotherhood,' estimates that 20% of London officers belong to Masonic lodges. He says there is cause for concern about this and in December, he gave evidence to the Select Committee inquiry of a case he had researched recently in Lancashire which, he told them, “demonstrates just how badly the administration of justice can go wrong when police, Crown Prosecution solicitors and private citizens are all in the same Masonic lodge.”

This story began one night in 1988 when two Leicester businessmen were taking a late-night drink in a hotel in Blackburn. A group of burly strangers in dinner jackets ordered them out of the bar. The Leicester men declined to go. The strangers then announced that they were policemen and proceeded to beat them up. They then called other police who arrested the two Leicester men and charged them with assaulting police officers. When the Leicester men were released on bail the next morning, they found that the hotel manager had seized their belongings until they agreed to pay for damage caused by the fight and that someone had let all the air out of their car tyres and removed their hub caps.

The Blackburn police and Crown prosecutors pursued the case to court, where the two Leicester men faced substantial jail sentences for allegedly assaulting policemen. But the case fell apart. The jury rejected all of the police evidence and found that the Leicester businessmen were not guilty of any offence at all. The judge signaled his own view by taking the unusual step of ordering that the defendants’ costs should be paid out of the public purse. The two men then sued for assault, wrongful arrest, malicious prosecution, conspiracy to injure and libel. In an out-of-court settlement, they were awarded £170,000, most of which was paid on behalf of the policemen by the Lancashire force.

Martin Short told the Select Committee that freemasonry was at the heart of this case. The two Leicester men had stumbled into the tail-end of a Masonic event, a dinner organised by the Victory lodge of Blackburn. This lodge, said Short, is dominated by police officers: the policemen who were involved in the original fight, the officer who subsequently investigated the incident, a senior official in the Crown Prosecution office which handled the case, and the manager of the hotel where the dinner took place were all members of the Victory lodge.

Giles York is the chief constable of Sussex Police ....... taking over from a long chain of chief constables, including Paul Whitehouse, who was finally forced to resign after the Home Secretary insisted that he should go following the shooting of Jimmy Ashley by PC Chris Sherwood.

It is possible that Sussex Police is just a bunch of incompetent bunglers, taking our tax dollars and squirting them up the wall as they masquerade in police uniforms and enjoy driving striped cars with sirens and blue flashing lights. Sure, to many the chance to put on a uniform is irresistible. They might have joined the Fire Brigade or the Armed Forces who have equally attractive outfits - if that is their bag!

As to police work, that is another matter. It is more a case of doing ones best to fit in with other organizations who actually run the show. Some are drug dealers, some bankers, wealthy local individuals and a large number of council officers and maybe even a councillor or two.

The way this works is by manipulating the level of investigation - what one chooses to investigate, or not investigate to achieve a desired outcome. You do not need to plant evidence as many believe, simply look that other way when you find something that proves the target is innocent.

Many people will think that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) call the shots, but in fact the real power is downstream, when conducting investigations, though orders to pull punches may come from upstream, it is the sappers on the ground who do all the basic dirty work, where other dirty tricks come from the chiefs and CPS civil servants. The integrity of police investigating officers is therefore of paramount importance, but their jobs and career prospects hinge on pleasing the bosses.

Any investigating officer can bury inconvenient evidence, turn a blind eye to other inconvenient evidence, ask a state witness to lose contradictory evidence or simply fabricate evidence as in the cases of the Guildford Four and Birmingham Six, not forgetting the James Ashley murder. That is why there is a Code of Conduct, that unfortunately, and despite several re-issues and re-vamps, is largely ignored by corrupt forces.

BIAS & THE CODE OF CONDUCT

Not many people get a reply to their correspondence even when reporting serious crimes, but this force will spend £10,000 of public money attempting to prosecute a person for goods to the value of £19.99, where that person is a thorn in the side of their chums at Wealden District Council.

On the other side of the coin, this force appear hesitant to investigate complaints involving £ hundreds of thousands of pounds in connection with land fraud and manipulation of land values, totally ignored by the crime commissioner, Katy Bourne.

WEALDEN DISTRICT COUNCIL MALFEASANCE

In December of 2016 two members of the public independently reported serious abuses of positions of trust at this Council. So far those informants have not received replies from this Chief Constable, let alone notification of his intention to investigate the allegations. 

A historic case of ingrained misuse of public office comes from Mr Chester Hudson reporting serious fraud involving Ian Kay and Mr Kay's father in law. 

A crime that is in progress as of 12th December 2016 comes from Nelson Kruschandl reporting serious fraud involving documents obtained by deception being lodged on the Local Land Charges Register to cause loss, contrary to Section 4 of the Fraud Act 2006. The officers concerned include David Whibley, George White and in the background, Ian Kay, David Phillips, J Douglas Moss and Thomas Hoy. 

F.A.O. Giles York
The Chief Constable                                                                                            RECORDED POST
Sussex Police Headquarters
Church Lane, Lewes
East Sussex, BN7 2DZ

                                                                                                                        13 December 2016

Dear Chief Constable,

FORMAL COMPLAINT - SUSPECTED MALFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE

Please find attached copy of my letter to Wealden District Council dated the 9th of December 2016, together with exhibits, the content of which is self explanatory and may also to be taken as a Witness Statement, since I am willing to attend any Court to give evidence against the officers of Wealden District Council in any prosecution.

This is a formal complaint asking you to investigate the obvious fraud, perversion of the course of justice and the removal of incriminating documents as identified by Mr Chester Hudson and I understand has been reported to you separately.

I look forward to hearing from you in due course as to the proposed course of action you intend taking


Yours faithfully,





Nelson Kruschandl (Complainant and Victim)

SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE

There are too many cases that demonstrate failures in investigations, for this to be a coincidence. Certain individuals that fall foul of Wealden District Council almost invariably end up being wrongly imprisoned or otherwise with a criminal record, or facing some kind of charge. This is one of Weaden's favourite ploys for disposing of cases where they have been caught red-handed tampering with or otherwise falsifying evidence in neighbour disputes, where Wealden DC have taken the side of the more influential citizen - instead of investigating matters impartially and honestly.

JOHN HOATH & CHRISTOPHER (CRIPPS HARRIES) HALL

The wrongful imprisonment of John Hoath is one of the most incredible miscarriages of justice occasioned by the Sussex Police ..... it is alleged, involving this force granting a gun license or certificate to a known criminal. Katy Bourne is now trying to shut Mr Hoath up using Surrey police solicitor Gilly Jones (Weightmans) and threatening an injunction, citing the case of Matt Taylor by way of what looks like an attempt to intimidated Mr Hoath.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

This site is protected under Article10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.