MINUTES IN DISPUTE  -  21 NOVEMBER 2016

At this point in time and looking at what appears to be a retrospective hash of what was actually said

HOME    |   CASE STUDIES    LAW   |    POLITICS    SCANDAL  |    SITE INDEX   |    WHISTLEBLOWING

 

Ian Stewart, Chairman of Herstmonceux Parish Council 2016

 

IAN STEWART (solicitor) - Chaired the meeting that these minutes relate to. The member of the public who they refer to is questioning the accuracy of the minutes and asking for a copy of the recording that was made at the instigation of the Chairman. Cllr Stewart is a consultant solicitor and company secretary practicing in residential and commercial property law.

 

 

It gets no higher than Lord Muskill, when in 1985 he identified that any local authority decision could be deemed to be improperly made if there was:

 

1. Unfair behaviour towards persons affected by the decision;

 

2. Failure to follow a procedure laid down by legislation;

 

3. Failure to properly marshal the evidence on which a decision should be based, including taking into account an immaterial factor, failing to take into account a material factor, or failing to take reasonable steps to obtain relevant information;

 

4. Failure to approach the decision in the right spirit, for example where the decision maker is actuated by bias or where he/she is content to let the decision be made by chance.

 

 

THE DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATED 21-11-16:

 

Herstmonceux Parish Council - Full Council (FCL)

MINUTES

HERSTMONCEUX PARISH COUNCIL

Herstmonceux Parish Full Council Meeting
Monday 21st November 2016, 7.30 p.m.

Small Hall, Herstmonceux Village Hall

Cllrs in attendance: Jenny Alder; Jo Angear; Angela Ashley; Malcolm Bradshaw; Mick Goodsell; Heather Kenward; Bryan Naish; Stephen Nash (VCh); Ian Stewart (Chair); Catherine Stirling- Reed; Max von Barnholt Krag; ESCC Cllrs Bentley and Keeley.

 

Clerk in attendance – Clare Harrison

 

RFO in attendance - Simon Goacher

 

Members of the Public – Two (N Kruschandl and B Gower [former chairman])

 

Item Number Minute Items Action

1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE - 16.11.130

No apologies had been received.
All Councillors were in attendance.

2. TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE FULL COUNCIL MEETING - 16.11.131

i. Minutes for approval meeting date 17.10.16
Minutes of FCL meeting 17.10.16 were agreed as a true and accurate
by all. Minutes Approved.
ii. Any outstanding actions
There were no outstanding actions

3. DECLARATIONS OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS - 16.11.132

i. Cllr Goodsell declared his regular interests in matters of
private contract works on trees / hedgerow cutting and other
general maintenance issues / works needed.
ii. Cllr Stewart declared his interest in any Village Hall matters.

4. MEMBERS DISPENSATION REQUESTS - 16.11.133

i. No new dispensation requests received
ii. Standing dispensation request for Cllr Goodsell re WD/2016/1977/O (not on this agenda)

5. PUBLIC QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS RELATING TO ITEMS ON AGENDA - 16.11.134

The members of the public were invited to speak. One member of the public declined the offer, one accepted.

Standing Orders were suspended at 19.33

The clerk had been given copies of publications of the history of the Old Steam House plus a copy of a report, entitled The Old Steam House, project ref 1146, for reference and interest. (These were not seen or circulated to the members present)

 

The council were informed of historical connections of the Old Steam House and issues that were presenting currently with renovation works and the need for the Lime Park Heritage Trust to raise awareness of the work being undertaken and fundraise.

 

Council responded that any support given by Council needed to ensure it offered proper representation for all the parish. The member of the public assured the Council that the Trust were not requesting funds from the Council but were asking for their support with promotion / representation of the Trust.

 

The Chair was reminded that Lime Park was on the Agenda at item number 12. However, the Council upheld the discussion and concluded their response at this Agenda. (This is not accurate and this was not mentioned at the time) A query was raised by The Chair as to who had legal ownership of the land that the building stood on as it was understood by the Council that the Lime Park Heritage Trust were not the legal owners and not shown as such in Land Registry. (The member of the public explained that a Trust situation had been in existence sine around 1994/5 and that the Land Registry knew of the Trust but that there was no need to register that information with the Land Registry. The Chairman also mentioned about the Museum not being a member of any organisation.)


In summary, the Council and the member of the Public differed in views of whether the LPHT owned the land or not and therefore the Council could make no recommendation to extend discussions to support promotion of the Lime Park Heritage Trust at this moment in time.
(There was no effort to secure any confirmation of the situation from the Trust, it appeared that a decision had been made to avoid the subject, where the Chairman had mentioned about the history of litigation - though this has nothing to do with the fact that the building is a historic asset)


The member of the public was thanked for their contribution.  -  Standing Orders resumed at 7.36pm

6. FINANCIAL OFFICERS REPORT AND PAYMENT OF ACCOUNTS - 16.11.135

Payments and receipts Nov 2016 - Councillor Angear joined the meeting at 7.40pm


Payments were presented as overleaf.

 

A query was raised regarding the first item, Admin: Hire of Room - Cheque 102139 issued 15/08/2016 - £15. The RFO explained that this had been a lost cheque and therefore had needed to be re-issued.

 

Two months’ timesheet for the NHP clerk had been received totalling 41.25 hours. All were in favour of the payment.

 

Cllr Kenward proposed acceptance for all payments and receipts. This was seconded by Cllr Bradshaw. All in favour. All presented payments Approved.

 

Herstmonceux Parish Council Meeting: 21 November 2016 Agenda Item: 06 - Payments of Account

Payment of Accounts - The following Accounts are submitted for payment approval:

 

Salaries for councillors and clerk to Herstmonceux Parish

 

Net expenditure versus income of Herstmonceux Parish Council

 

SALARIES - You can see from these accounts for the year to November 2016 that the members of the council are monetarily rewarded for their time, as is the clerk to the council. That being the case R v Bowden applies.

 


Simon P. Goacher  -  Responsible Finance Officer 07 November 2016

7. FINANCE AND GENERAL PURPOSES COMMITTEE MINUTES – 16.11.136

i. Minutes for approval meeting date 01/11/16
Minutes of FGP meeting 01.11.16 were agreed as a true and accurate by all. Minutes Approved.

ii. Any Recommendations for Full Council ratification


Recommendation for donation for Defibrillator Training Approved.

Recommendation for consultation with residents of Stunts Green for Council adoption of BT Telephone Box at Stunts Green Approved.


Recommendation for consultation with residents of Windmill Hill for Council adoption of BT Telephone Box at Windmill Hill Approved.


Recommendation not to award CPRE a donation was challenged and requested to be Deferred back to the next FGP(Com) agenda.

iii. Confidential Minutes for approval: Pers-Sub(Com) meeting dates 01/11/16; 07/11/15; 15/11/16; Minutes of the Pers-Sub(Com) meeting dates 01/11/16; 07/11/15 and 15/11/16 were of a personal nature and could not be discussed in
public. However, all Council members had received a copy. Minutes were accepted as a true and accurate by members of the PER(Sub-Com). Minutes Approved.

i. Any Recommendations for Full Council ratification


Minutes of the Pers-Sub(Com) meeting dates 01/11/16; 07/11/15 and 15/11/16 were of a personal nature and could not be discussed in public. However, all Council members had received a copy and there were no objections to recommendations that had been made.


Recommendations Approved.

ii. Interim audit report 2016/17

Interim audit circulated, acknowledged by all. Clerk to liaise with RFO and Standing Order WG to set a meeting date for the review of the Financial Regulations. The RFO reminded all Councillors that all outstanding estimates are needing to be submitted. The RFO notified all Councillors of the delay to the tender process due to Council awaiting confirmation from ESCC of map tender areas still needing clarification.


Clerk and Cllrs to instigate consultation RFO for FGP agenda Clerk and RFO Cllrs

8. AMENITIES COMMITTEE MINUTES – 16.11.137

i. Minutes for approval – there were no outstanding minutes for approval.

ii. Any Recommendations for Full Council ratification – there were no new recommendations for approval.

iii. O/s recommendation approval from AME meeting 26.09.16 Recommendation for Dog Poo spray campaign re-instatement was Approved.

Recommendation to apply for a TPO for a tree in Cowbeech was Deferred back to the next AME(Com) agenda due to additional information being obtained by Cllr Goodsell for consideration.

Standing Orders suspended at 8.05 to allow the second member of the public to speak.

It was reported that the ESCC Highways cutting of Lower Road verges had still not been undertaken. This had now been taken care of by local Landowners.

The RFO informed all present of the meeting between HMX PC and ESCC Highways representatives later this week, Friday 23rd November. The meeting focus was the tendering and contracts of cutting of verges and hedges.


Standing Orders were resumed at 8.10pm.


Cllr Nash to action

9. PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES – 16.11.138

i. Minutes for approval meeting date 15/11/16
Minutes of PLN(Com) meeting 15.11.16 were agreed as a true and accurate by all. Minutes Approved.


ii. Any Recommendations for Full Council ratification

Letter in response to Southern Water delays to scheme building process was letter Approved for sending.


10. TO ACCEPT MINUTES AND / OR REPORTS FROM THE FOLLOWING: - 16.11.139

i. Communications Working Group - Verbal updates from the COM(WG) were acknowledged and accepted.
ii. Cuckmere Bus - Meeting notes acknowledged and accepted.
iii. Herstmonceux Village Hall - Meeting notes acknowledged and accepted.
iv. Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group - Meeting notes from the NHP Steering Group were acknowledged and
accepted.

11. EMERGENCY PLAN - 16.11.140

Cllr Ashley updated the Council with the findings of her review of the Emergency Plan. It was concluded that key questions arise from the current format of the plan which are:


 What constitutes an emergency?

 Who activates the emergency plan?

Clerk and RFO to liaise to initiate meeting

 What triggers the process?


Cllr Ashley Recommended that the plan needed updating to a workable format, simplifying the layout, in order that the questions above can be answered and the correct response delivered efficiently and effectively. It was also Recommended that, although all Councillors were members of the Emergency Plan Working Party that an initial meeting be called for Cllrs AA, CSR, SN, The Clerk and the RFO to meet with John Wood the ESCC Emergency Planning Officer to enable them to begin to undertake this work. It was Agreed that the updating work to the Emergency Plan would start early in Jan 2017 and be ready for full council presentation by the end of March 2017.


Recommendations Approved by all.

12. LIME PARK - 16.11.141

No further discussions were had at this point of the agenda. Please see Agenda Item 5 for full discussion detail. The Chair additionally commented that there had also been no developments on the Lime Cross site as the developers had not been in contact.

13. SMART ENERGY IN COMMUNITIES - 16.11.142

It was proposed that the Council support the promotion of the upcoming exhibition of the governments Smart Energy GB in Communities campaign.
Approved by all. Cllr Kenward to promote in PC Parish Mag bulletin.

14. ACTION POINTS - 16.11.143

i. Update on Variation on the Lease – approval of Kent CC

proposed action

Proposed actions Agreed by all. Clerk to notify Kent CC in order to process the work.

ii. Finger Post - The Finger Post is now back in situ.

iii. Grit Bin at Windmill Hill - The Grit Bin is now in situ.

iv. De Fib Training


Bookings have been received. Places still available for both sessions.

v. Village CCTV

Village CCTV was installed in the past as a temporary measure to deter a local bout of crime. The initiative was successful and the camera use removed after a short period. The project was a joint one with Sussex

Police who hold the cameras and offer the Parish access to one should they need it. Any revised use and monitoring of CCTV would have to be authorised and arranged with Sussex Police.

vi. Cricket Club request for recommendation letter Response letter Approved.

vii. Establishing relationships with neighbouring PCs. Meeting dates have been received. Chair, Vice Chair , Cllrs HK, JAN, JAL and CSR are interested in attending. Clerk to circulate meeting dates.

viii. Business sought by local charity

Information to be promoted in the next PC newsletter. Clerk to forward Clerk to collate and send Cllr Kenward

15. BT CONSULTATION FOR PHONE BOX REMOVAL OR ADOPTION - 16.11.144

This item was discussed and agreed at Agenda item 7

16. CORRESPONDENCE – FOR NOTING OR ACTION - 16.11.145

Contents of circulation envelope circulated to all Councillors

ESCC Councillors Reports

Cllr BB informed the Council of:

 ESCC discussions of the possibility of creating Wild Flower Verges
 ESX as a White Ribbon area renewal of funding for further 2yrs
 WDC now accredited as White Ribbon district
 His visit to the Sussex Police Resolution Centre to observe this project in its pilot as an alternative to the PCSO. Cllr BB will continue to monitor its development.
 Raise awareness of the Sussex Police Commissioner consultation of proposal to increase precept by £5 In answer to PC Cllr queries Cllr BB responded that:
 Due consideration of Cowbeech Bonfire Society Correspondence was being discussed
 Funding for Charles Hunt Centre in Hailsham was a matter for Age Concern as they were the managing body.
 The Waste and Mineral Plan report is now published
 Recommendations for the Electoral Arrangements are now published and being submitted to the House of Commons for
approval. Cllr Keeley updates included:
 Attendance of Older People Matters attendance
 Various other activities
 A document Cllr Keeley has produced, available via website, for information on his research and concluding thoughts.
Refer to AME(Com)

17. ITEMS FOR REFERRAL TO NEXT AGENDA OR APPROPRIATE COMMITTEE - 16.11.146

 

As per Agenda items
Street Lighting planning and estimates – referred to FGP
Village Planters – referred to FGP


The meeting closed at 9.10pm
Date of Next Full Council Meeting: Monday 12th December, 2016 - Small Hall, Herstmonceux Village Hall

 

 

EMAIL TO IAN STEWART, BILL BENTLEY, LAURENCE KEELEY, SIMON GOACHER & CLARE HARRISON

 

Dear Mr Stewart,

Having read the minutes of the meeting of the 21st of November 2016, I can advise that I am very disappointed at the level of inaccuracy of the Minutes, that appear to have been written retrospectively to account for the absence of any discussion about Herstmonceux Museum at Section 12 of the Agenda.

You will recall that after the meeting that I spoke with you as to why there had been no discussion between the members and you said to me that you had gotten confused as to Lime Cross and Lime Park and thought the item was in connection with the planning permission for 70 houses in the field adjacent.

You will appreciate that that is very different to what is shown on the proposed Minutes.

You then said to me that the item would be placed on the Agenda for the next full council meeting for discussion.

That is also not reflected in the Minutes.

I fail to see how ownership of the site had become the issue, when in fact the issue was to have been how your council might be able to help Herstmonceux Museum and make better use of this community asset.

As far as I am aware the Lime Park Heritage Trust have not received any correspondence from you on the subject, which is something I would have expected where such an important historic building is concerned. 

Please advise if this is an oversight?

It is incumbent on your council to take steps to marshal the evidence on which a decision is to be based and not proceed on assumption.

Please advise what steps you took and who you contacted to find out the relevant information. You mentioned the Land Registry. Did you council contact the Land Registry?

It is not sufficient to contact only those who might help one point of view, to dispose of an awkward topic with the least amount of effort.

You also mentioned that Herstmonceux Museum was not a member of any associations, presumably as another reason for your council not to offer any assistance.

This is not reflected in the minutes.

I can advise that Herstmonceux Museum is a member of the Museums Association.

In my view the minutes do not reflect what actually happened and I know the meeting was recorded.

Could I therefore please have a copy of the recording of this meeting so that I can review the discourse and give you and anyone else interested in the proper functioning of your council a snapshot of your administration.

Please let me know the procedure for purchase of the recording as soon as possible.

You should know that a course of conduct that is unhelpful or not properly considered, or biased in any way is unlawful according to Lord Muskill.

I would advise that it is in everyones best interest that you do not compound the apparent misfeasance in public office that I have identified, but that rather you should correct the minutes to give a true record of events.

Should your council fail to make the corrections to the minutes that any member of the public would expect of corruption free councillors and a corruption free council, the matter will escalate to the status of malfeasance in public office, in which event the matter is ripe for a criminal investigation as per R. v Dytham 1979 (467 3 WLR).

The matter is also ripe for investigation by the Local Government Ombudsman for maladministration.

In the circumstances I would hope that your council will not approve the draft minutes at the next full council meeting set for the 12th of December 2016 as they stand.

You can of course seek to agree with myself more appropriate wording in sufficient time that the full committee can approve them. I would urge you to give this suggestion serious consideration and I will of course cooperate to help you to meet your timescale.

Please note that I will be attending this meeting in order to exercise my Article 10 rights to receive and impart information.

I might also remind you of the suggestion of Eric Pickles when he was the Minister responsible for planning matters and local affairs, that he advocated members of the public video recording council meetings to avoid misinterpretation - and muddling of the actual words used and the context in which they were used.

This might be inconvenient to some of the members of the council, but you and every other member of the Parish council are answerable to the taxpayers/voters that elected you and to the courts.

I am sure that the 300 or so interested persons who made their views known about the 70 house application last year - as the Herstmonceux Action Group - and whose objections the previous Parish council ignored, will be particularly keen to read about any present disputes. Please note that I was not a member of this action group, but just as interested in the goings on.

I look forward to hearing from you on a return basis.

 

Yours sincerely,


Nelson K (planning advocate & strategist)
for Lime Park Heritage Trust

 

Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 10:41 PM

 

 

ADVERSE POSSESSION - THE 10 and 12 YEAR RULES

 

The occupier (or squatter) and any predecessors through whom they claim have been in adverse possession for at least 10 years (or at least 60 years for Crown foreshore) ending on the date of the application (Schedule 6, paragraph 1(1) of the Land Registration Act 2002).

“Factual possession signifies an appropriate degree of physical control. It must be a single and [exclusive] possession, though there can be a single possession exercised on behalf of several persons jointly. An example of this could be a Trust, Cooperative or a Limited Company.

Where the land was previously open ground, fencing is strong evidence of factual possession, but it is neither indispensable nor conclusive. Maintaining that hedge is also evidence of factual possession.

What is required is “not an intention to own or even an intention to acquire ownership but an intention to possess” (Buckinghamshire County Council v Moran (1988) 86 LGR 472, per Hoffman J, approved by House of Lords in J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham [2002] UKHL 30). This means “the intention, in one’s own name and on one’s own behalf, to exclude the world at large, including the owner with the paper title if he be not himself the possessor, so far as reasonably practicable and so far as the processes of the law will allow” (Powell v McFarlane (1979) 38 P & CR 452, 471-472, per Slade J, approved by House of Lords in J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham [2002] UKHL 30).

Where the occupier/squatter has been able to establish factual possession, the intention to possess will frequently be deduced from the acts making up that factual possession. This may include work to buildings, ground works or other emplacements, even paving.

You must make your application on form ADV1 accompanied by a statement of truth or statutory declaration that meets the following requirement (Land Registration Rules 2003, rule 188(1)(a) and (2)).

There is no legal requirement to register the land in question, where it is subjective as to when such application may be made and that is at the discretion of the applicant. You may write to the Land Registry to give notice as to intention to apply at some point in the future, so putting in place a date from which any other interested person could object - if it is that they have any prior registration or other occupation that may need to be rebutted.

PROOFS

The statements of truth or statutory declarations should be factual and, ideally, the person making the statement or declaration will use their own words rather than language copied from precedent books. The person should expressly state how the facts are known to them, if this is not implicit in the statement or declaration. Information from third parties who have observed the position on the ground but may have no knowledge of the squatter’s intentions or dealings with the owner will usually carry less weight than the squatter’s own statement or declaration. However, statements of truth or statutory declarations from neighbours and other third parties, sent in with the squatter’s statement of truth or statutory declaration, may be useful as corroborative evidence.

Enforcement action by a local authority is also useful evidence of occupation and the intention to occupy, especially where that authority has failed to make any effort to find previous occupiers or advertise, or make appropriate enquiries of the Land Registry.


CHARGES

The general rule is that a squatter is automatically entitled to be registered free of any registered charges (but not charges protected by a notice in the register) affecting the title immediately before their registration (Schedule 6, paragraph 9(3) of the Land Registration Act 2002).

The Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs has published a Guidance note on adverse possession of common land and town or village greens which is available on its website: www.defra.gov.uk. (Land Registry does not necessarily share all statements of opinion as to the law that are expressed in the guidance note.).

 

 

FRIENDS OF HERSTMONCEUX MUSEUM

It remains to be seen who on this reconfigured council are friends of the in-progress restoration of the old generating buildings in Lime Park. At the moment it appears not. In the past councillors like Brian Jarman bent over backwards to accommodate the agendas of Ian Kay and Vic Scarpa, who had been instrumental in formulating what amounted to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, in the deception of the Secretary of State's Inspector Raymond Portal Dannruether RN in 1986/7. The point here is that such councillors are just puppets, more interested in getting a few brownie points and keeping their positions locally by kissing a few civil servant butts - than actually standing up for what is right when it matters.

 

This was revealed between 1998 and 2000, when the true history of the Generating Works slowly unraveled as archaeologists trawled over the wooden building to find that it was the genuine article. You can imagine the effect that this news had on Douglas Moss, Chistine Nuttall and David Phillips - who had themselves conspired to pervert the course of justice, in the case of Doug Moss and David Phillips, going so far as to falsify the date attribution on photographs to make it appear that the occupier was in breach of an Enforcement Notice - that is in fact defective on several counts and a false instrument. These officers had built their careers and Wealden's re-charge budgets on harassing the former occupier with more than 180 site visits at the ratepayers expense.

 

The Trust have paid no heed to the previous goings on. They are more concerned with conservation and finding a reasonable and beneficial use to pay for the upkeep and repairs to this marvel of modern science. The Parish Council have been invited to adopt a similar stance in the interests of conservation.

 

 

Herstmonceux Museum in East Sussex, England

 

HERSTMONCEUX MUSEUM - At the turn of the century some more enlightened souls followed the work of Thomas Alva Edison in the USA, and other pioneers of electricity for lighting and installed their own private generating facilities in the UK. Charles de Roemer, an electrical engineer, constructed this substantial complex in Lime Park based on coal that was used to produce combustible gas for an internal combustion engine. By 1982, this building was falling over and would have done so, except for the occupation of another engineer who recognised the industrial find and took the trouble to shore up the structure - so beginning the long climb to get this valuable historic asset the recognition that it deserves.

 

 

 

DISCRIMINATION - It is unlawful to discriminate against any person or organisation, with reference to Article 14 of the Human Rights Act 1998. That said, preferential treatment appears to be routinely given to some members of the community, while Wealden DC use their position of trust to give others a very rough ride to foster the finances of those they may have helped in the past for consideration of another kind. Consideration does not always have to be the folding stuff. It can be the grant of a planning permission or other planning favour - that can be hindering a neighboring application or development.

 

The pictures above are some examples of planning consents (or development agreed as being permitted) that has been granted in and around Lime Park, Herstmonceux. In the case of Lime and Oak View [lower right], this is a massive house built on green belt without any suggestion of affordability or other special circumstances. Double garages is a luxury not a necessity. Compare the cooperation of Wealden in the procurement of these consents, with the £500,000 of taxpayers money spent to prevent the restoration of Herstmonceux Museum in days gone by. Anyone looking at the facts would have to question why this council is acting so perversely - when planning permission all around the site is being given for much larger developments, to include a grant for 70 houses in the adjacent field. You might ask if the builders were connected in any way with any council member - and if they were - if suitable declarations were made.

 

 

COUNCILLOR LINE UP FOR 2016

 

Ian Stewart

Mr Ian Stewart (Chairman)
Chestnut Lodge
West End
Herstmonceux BN27 4NZ

01323 833450
chair@herstmonceuxparish.org.uk

Josephine Angear

Mrs Josephine Angear
Penlands
Church Road
Herstmonceux BN27 1RJ

01323 832210

 Heather Kenward

Mrs Heather Kenward
West End House
West End
Herstmonceux BN27 4NL

01323 833509


Ms Angela Ashley
22 Fairfield
Herstmonceux
East Sussex BN27 4NE

01323 832789

Mrs Jenny Alder

Mrs Jenny Alder
Bamburi
Joes Lane
Windmill Hill BN274TN 

01323 832329

Michael Goodsell

Mr Michael Goodsell
Little Hollingwood
Chilsham Lane
Herstmonceux BN27 4QQ

01323 832178

Bryan Naish

Mr Bryan Naish
Cobwebs, 29 Pippin Close
Orchard View
Windmill Hill BN27 4TU 

01323 833747

 Stephen Nash

Mr Stephen Nash
1 The willows
Gardner Street
Herstmonceux BN27 4TQ

01323 833203

Malcolm Bradshaw

Mr Malcolm Bradshaw
The Willows
West End
Herstmonceux BN27 4NL

01323 833365

Catherine Sterling-Reed

Mrs Catherine Sterling-Reed
Stone's Meadow
Bagham Lane
Herstmonceux BN27 4NA

01323 833308

Max von Barnholt Krag

Mr Max von Barnholt Krag
Primrose Cottage
Chapel Row
Herstmonceux BN27 1RB

01323 832917

 

 

Finance Officer

Simon Goacher

Mr Simon Goacher
Cosi
Old Road
Magham Down
Hailsham BN27 1PR

01323 843210
Mob: 07802 416840
Fax: 01323 843210

finance@herstmonceux

Wealden District Council - District Councillor

 Andrew Long

Mr A Long
Allis Farmhouse
Marklye Lane
Rushlake Green
Heathfield TN21 9QH

Tel: 01435 830164
Mob: 07654 306738

 

East Sussex County Council - County Councillors

 Bill Bentley

Mr William Bentley
15 Sandbanks Close
Hailsham BN27 3TJ

Tel: 01323 442582

cllr.bill.bentley@eastsussex.gov.uk

 Laurence Keeley

Mr Laurence Keeley
6 Fairfield
Herstmonceux BN27 4NE

Tel: 01323 832660

cllr.laurence.keeley@eastsussex.gov.uk

 

 

PARISH CLERK

 

 

 

Mrs Clare Harrison (time for change already)
The Parish Office
Herstmonceux Village Hall
Hailsham Road
Herstmonceux BN27 4JX 

Tel: 01323 833312
Mob: 
Email: clerk@herstmonceuxparish.org.uk

 

 

SUSSEX INDEX A - Z

 

ARUNDEL CASTLE

BATTLE

BATTLE ABBEY

BATTLE OF HASTINGS

BEACHY HEAD

BEXHILL

BODIAM CASTLE

BRIGHTON

CHICHESTER

CHIDDINGLY - HORSE SHOW and GYMKHANA

CROWBOROUGH

CUCKMERE VALLEY - EXCEAT

DISTRICT AND BOROUGH COUNCILS

EAST SUSSEX
EASTBOURNE

FIRLE

FIRLE BONFIRE SOCIETY

GLYNDE

GUY FAWKES

HAILSHAM

HASTINGS

HEATHFIELD

HERSTMONCEUX - MUSEUM - COSTS SCANDAL - 70 HOUSES - TRAFFIC - 70 MORE HOUSES - ACTION GROUP

LEWES

LEWES DISTRICT COUNCIL

NEWHAVEN

PEVENSEY CASTLE

RYE

SEAFORD

SEVEN SISTERS

SUSSEX

SUSSEX THINGS TO DO GUIDE

THE BATTLE OF HASTINGS

TRUGS

TWISSELLS MILL, OLD HEATHFIELD

UCKFIELD

WEALD

 

 

LINKS

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/land-registry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Registration_Act_2002

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents

 

 

The Old Rectory, Lime Park, East Sussex

 

FORMER STABLES - Wealden might say to one owner that they don't need permission to change the appearance of the outside of a building, such as the change from clay peg tiles to cement tiles on the Old Rectory in Lime Park - this change of materials completely altered the appearance of the stable keepers cottage. Then again, they might treat another occupier in Lime Park unfavourably, demanding a planning application for works that are in reality a permitted development, such as repairs to pre-existing woodwork.

 

Unfavourable treatment = discrimination in English law, as per the famous case of Kelly Davis a father of two, of Bath, won his civil action against the now defunct Wansdyke District Council last year when a Judge at Bristol County Court ruled that planning officers had "conducted themselves in a consistently unhelpful and obstructive fashion" in refusing to grant him planning permission for work on his home between 1989 and 1991. In this case the award of damages was £750,000.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2016 HST (formerly HS UK Ltd)Cleaner Oceans Club Limited (not for profit organisations)