MAX CLIFFORD

  The Sexual Offences Act and other arbrogations, effectively breach Article 6 for any person accused of a sex crime, in that you are presumed guilty, rather than presumed innocent.

HOME     |   CASE STUDIES   |   LAW   |    POLITICS   |   SCANDAL  |     SITE INDEX   |    WHISTLEBLOWING

 

 

 


It was once that in merry old England you got a fair trial. Not any more. In their rush to increase the conviction rate, the government of the day, with David (himself the subject of sex scandal) Blunkett as the Justice Minister, decided to breach Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, by taking away the presumption of innocence. This was achieved in subtle fashion by taking away the warning to Juries, "about the dangers of convicting a person on the unsupported say so of of a claimant." Thus, any person making a gold-digging [false] claim of abuse, will be believed, because the trial judge has not told them differently. After that little ruse and other amendments in the Sexual Offences Act 2003, the conviction rate soared - filling our prisons with many innocent men in the process. Did you say "prats?", If you did, we tend to agree. So come on all you claimants, why not accuse a politician of giving you one up the rear? Give them a taste of their own medicine. There is no need for proof and it won't matter if when they inspect your anal passage that they find no evidence of trauma - believe us, that will be put down to some incredible healing power. Bullshit! But that is what is happening out there today. It's true.

 

When it come to historical allegations, there is almost no chance of mounting a defence. Any witnesses to provide an alibi will long since have forgotten about dates and times. Your own diaries will have been thrown away and other information such as telephone bills, etc, will be long gone. Basically, the way the law is at the moment, it's a free for all bandwagon, for any unscrupulous woman to earn a few bob.

 

 

 

 

HISTORY

Maxwell Frank Clifford (born 6 April 1943) is an English publicist, considered the highest-profile and best-known publicist in the United Kingdom. Although his client range is varied, he is a controversial figure as he often represents unpopular clients (such as those accused or convicted of crimes) and works for people wishing to sell "kiss-and-tell" stories to tabloid newspapers.

A traditional Labour supporter, Clifford openly vowed to bring down the government of John Major because he felt that the National Health Service was mismanaged, having dealt with the NHS in attempting to obtain treatment for his daughter, who has juvenile idiopathic arthritis. While he is primarily known for helping to bring damaging allegations to light, he insists that today most of his work is concerned with concealment of stories.

 

ARREST

Clifford was arrested on 6 December 2012 by Metropolitan Police officers, at his home at 7.04 am, on suspicion of sexual offences; the arrest was part of Operation Yewtree. He was brought to a central London police station for questioning. The two alleged offences in question dated from 1977.

On 26 April 2013 he was charged with a further eleven indecent assaults from 1966 to 1985 on girls and women aged 1419.

Clifford has claimed that the allegations against him are "completely false".

 

 

 

 

It's difficult to stay focused with such allegations ruining your career

 

 



 

SIMILAR CASES

 

This case is not a million miles away from something closer to home in the United Kingdom, that of a certain person challenging local authority, then being convicted unjustly of sexual charges - that if one looks at them closely, are completely out of character. It appears to us that given the opportunity, local and national authorities will use whatever is at their disposal to bury anyone who dares to question their administration. Freedom of speech? Yes, but for how long?

 

And don't forget that the system protects the claimant by hiding his or her identity, when very often that identity is the key to the public understanding why such an allegation has been made. Usually it is at the break up of a relationship, or some other event where the motive is revenge - typically, a woman who has been jilted will seek to attack the party jilting her, by making a false allegation. The sad fact is that under the present system, it matters not if someone is innocent or not. Put a person in the dock and make the accusation, especially some time after the claimed event, and there is no way of defending yourself. Then, with the judge not giving the jury guidance as to unsupported allegations, the bloke in the dock will be convicted.

 

 

 

 

LINKS

 

max-clifford-conviction-celebrities-law-keir-starmer

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2320419/Jimmy-Tarbuck-arrested-alleged-sex-attack-young-boy-1970s.htm

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/Jimmy-Tarbuck-arrested-alleged-sex-attack-young-boy-1970s

www.independent.co.uk/crime/jimmy-tarbuck-arrested-over-child-sex-abuse-allegations

Coronation Street king Bill Roache says he is 'horrified by the last 24 hours' vows to fight rape allegation TV chiefs rework scripts

Scotland Yard detectives interview woman 'witness' after travelling to Australia to pursue sex abuse claims against Rolf Harris

British detectives have flown out to Australia to investigate Rolf Harris sex abuse claims

Television comedy legend in his 70s facing questioning by Savile police over historic allegations of sex abuse

Living 24/7 nightmare Max Clifford on 'black cloud' over his life charged 11 counts of indecent assault girls 14 to 19 1966 and 1985

Comedian Freddie Starr arrested again over further allegations of sexual offences

http://news.sky.com/story/1082618/freddie-starr-rearrested-by-savile-police

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/freddie-starr-i-feel-suicidal-after-1434829

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/uk-police-inquiry-broadens-to-sydney-20130502-2ivze.html

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jimmy-tarbuck-cancels-summer-tour-1874910

 

 

FAIR USE NOTICE

 

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

 

This site is protected under Article10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.